Toyota Tundra in Canada - Canadian Prices, Trims, Specs, Photos, Recalls | AutoTrader.ca

Toyota Tundra

Toyota Tundra

Photos

Reviews and News

View All Articles

Owner Scores

Based on 71 reviews
Comfort 9
90% Complete
Performance 9
90% Complete
Fuel Economy 7
70% Complete
Interior Design 9
90% Complete
Exterior Styling 9
90% Complete
Reliability 10
100% Complete

Owner Reviews

BearHunter Still the best truck March 17, 2018 SR5 TRD package
Overall Score
One word RELIABLE. This truck doesn't have any fancy gadgets or be the best on gas but I'm also never at the garage unless its for regular mainteneance. No regrets with a Tundra.
Comfort 10
100% Complete
Performance 10
100% Complete
Fuel Economy 6
60% Complete
Interior Design 8
80% Complete
Exterior Styling 8
80% Complete
Reliability 10
100% Complete
View all owner reviews

Recall Information

Recall number
Recall date
System affected
Model year(s) affected
Recall number
2020-514
Recall date
2020-10-28
System affected
Fuel Supply
Model year(s) affected
2018 2019
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC RB3 & SRC RB4
Units Affected:
109,189
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue: On certain vehicles, the low-pressure fuel pump could fail. If this happens, then engine may run rough or may not start and the check engine light may turn on. This could also result in a sudden loss of engine power while driving. Note: This recall is an expansion of recalls SRC R95/SRC R96 and SRC RA2/SRC RA3 (Transport Canada Recall Numbers 2020-005 and 2020-088). Safety Risk: A sudden loss of engine power could increase the risk of a crash. Corrective Actions: The company will notify owners by mail and instruct you to take your vehicle to a dealer to replace the fuel pump.
Recall number
2020-321
Recall date
2020-07-15
System affected
Lights And Instruments
Model year(s) affected
2018 2019 2020
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC RA9
Units Affected:
23,080
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
Issue: On certain vehicles, the wire harness for the front turn signal lights was assembled incorrectly. As a result, the turn signals and hazard warning lights are not bright enough to meet Canadian regulations. This could cause other road users not to notice when the signal or hazard warning lights are turned on. Safety Risk: Signal lights that are not bright enough could make the vehicle less visible to others, and could increase the risk of a crash. Corrective Actions: Toyota will notify owners by mail and instruct you to take your vehicle to a dealer to modify the wire harness for the front turn signal lights.
Recall number
2020-088
Recall date
2020-03-04
System affected
Fuel Supply
Model year(s) affected
2018 2019
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC RA2 / SRC RA3
Units Affected:
111,529
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue: On certain vehicles, the low-pressure fuel pump could fail. If this happens, then engine may run rough or may not start and the check engine light may turn on. This could also result in a sudden loss of engine power while driving. Safety Risk: A sudden loss of engine power could increase the risk of a crash. Corrective Actions: The company will notify owners by mail and instruct you to take your vehicle to a dealer to replace the fuel pump.
Recall number
2020-005
Recall date
2020-01-13
System affected
Fuel Supply
Model year(s) affected
2018 2019
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R95 / SRC R96
Units Affected:
54,684
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue: On certain vehicles, the low-pressure fuel pump could fail. If this happens, then engine may run rough or may not start and the check engine light may turn on. This could also result in a sudden loss of engine power while driving. Safety Risk: A sudden loss of engine power could increase the risk of a crash. Corrective Actions: The company will notify owners by mail. The corrective actions for this recall are still being finalized.
Recall number
2019-651
Recall date
2019-12-20
System affected
Label
Model year(s) affected
2019 2020
Manufacturer Recall Number:
VSCLOC-19-043
Units Affected:
178
Notification Type:
Inconsequential
Issue: On certain vehicles, the spare tire size is listed as P275/65R18, whereas the actual installed spare tire size is P255/70R18. Canadian regulations require companies correct tire information on the tire information label. Safety Risk: This small error is unlikely to affect safety. Corrective Action: This is not a recall. This notice is for information only. The company has made changes to correct this label on all new vehicles.
Recall number
2019-523
Recall date
2019-10-17
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2003 2004 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R90 / SRC R91
Units Affected:
37,591
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue: On certain vehicles, long-term exposure to high absolute humidity and temperature, combined with high temperature cycling, may eventually degrade the propellant contained in the passenger-front airbag. This could cause the airbag to deploy with more force than normal. If the airbag inflator ruptures, fragments could be propelled toward vehicle occupants or cause damage to the airbag assembly, preventing its proper function. Safety Risk: If the vehicle is involved in a crash requiring an airbag deployment, the airbag inflator could rupture and create a risk of injury. Corrective Action: Owners will be notified by mail and instructed to take their vehicle to a dealer to have the passenger-front airbag inflator or airbag module replaced. Note: The Canadian climate results in the propellant degrading slowly. This recall is being conducted as a precaution to address future risk. It is expected that all airbag inflators will be replaced before their function would be affected. Additional Note: Vehicles may have had the original front passenger airbag inflator replaced as a “like-for-like” replacement under recall 2016-103 (Toyota Recall #'s SRC 241 & SRC 242) as a temporary remedy while evaluating a permanent remedy. These vehicles will receive the permanent remedy passenger airbag assembly under this recall.
Recall number
2018-699
Recall date
2018-12-12
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2003
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R69 & SRC R71
Units Affected:
5,369
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, long-term exposure to high absolute humidity and temperature, combined with high temperature cycling, could eventually degrade the propellant contained in the passenger frontal airbag. This could cause the airbag to deploy with more force than normal. As a result, if the vehicle were involved in a collision that warrants airbag deployment, fragments could be propelled toward vehicle occupants, and the airbag assembly could be damaged, preventing proper function. These issues could increase the risk of injury. Correction: Dealers will replace the passenger frontal airbag inflator or airbag assembly. Note: Canadian climate results in the propellant degrading slowly. The recall is being conducted as a precaution to address future risk, and is expected to replace airbag inflators before their function would be affected. Vehicles may have had the original front passenger airbag inflator replaced as a “like-for-like” replacement under recall 2013-133 (Toyota Recall #'s SSC 193/241 & SSC 194/242) as a temporary remedy while evaluating a permanent remedy. These vehicles will receive the permanent remedy passenger airbag assembly under this recall.
Recall number
2018-547
Recall date
2018-10-05
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2018 2019
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R67
Units Affected:
15,774
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
Certain vehicles may not comply with the requirements of Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (CMVSS) 208 - Occupant Protection in Frontal Impacts and CMVSS 214 - Side Impact Protection. The airbag (SRS) control unit may incorrectly detect a fault in one or more of the front or side airbag impact sensors during vehicle start up. In the event of a crash where airbag deployment is required, this may result in the airbags not deploying as designed, increasing the risk of injury. Upon detection of a fault in the airbag system, multiple warning lights would activate, a warning buzzer would sound, and a warning message would display on the instrument panel display. Correction: Dealers will update the airbag control unit software. Note: This recall supersedes recall 2018-100. Vehicles repaired as part of the previous recall will require re-inspection and repair.
Recall number
2018-100
Recall date
2018-02-21
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2018
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R56
Units Affected:
8,180
Notification Type:
Superseded
Certain vehicles may fail to comply with the requirements of Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (CMVSS) 126 - Electronic Stability Control Systems. Electrical noise could be introduced into the YAW rate sensor within the airbag ECU, which could result in deactivation of the Vehicle Stability Control and Pre-Collision systems and limited function of the Trailer Brake Controller system. This would be contrary to the requirements of the standard, and could increase the risk of a crash causing injury and/or damage to property. Correction: Dealers will update the software of the ECU. Note: This recall is superseded by recall 2018547. Please see recall 2018547 for more information.
Recall number
2018-097
Recall date
2018-02-20
System affected
Seats And Restraints
Model year(s) affected
2017
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R57
Units Affected:
578
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
Certain vehicles may fail to conform to Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard CMVSS 207 - Anchorage of Seats, CMVSS 210 - Seat Belt Anchorages, CMVSS 210.1 - User-ready Tether Anchorages for Restraint Systems and Booster Seats, and CMVSS 210.2 - Lower Universal Anchorage Systems for Restraint Systems and Booster Seats. One or more of the bolts fixing the left hand rear split seat bracket sub-assemblies to the floor pan may not have been tightened properly during assembly. This could allow the seat to move in the event of a crash, increasing the risk of injury to the seat occupant. Correction: Dealers will retighten the five seat leg bracket bolts.
Recall number
2017-363
Recall date
2017-07-20
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2016 2017
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R47/R48
Units Affected:
39,189
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles, the electrical power cords of some dealer installed block heaters may have been improperly manufactured, causing the wires to contact each other, resulting in a short circuit. A short circuit could lead to a fire which would increase the risk of injury and/or damage to property. Correction: For vehicles where the subject block heater was approved for installation, the dealer will replace the block heater assembly with a new one of an improved design. For vehicles where the subject block heater was not approved for installation, dealers will remove the block heater assembly. In the interim, until the remedy can be performed, dealers will cut the plug end from the block heater cord to disable the block heater's operation.
Recall number
2017-036
Recall date
2017-01-24
System affected
Structure
Model year(s) affected
2016 2017
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R33
Units Affected:
6,157
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles equipped with the plastic rear step bumper, the resin reinforcement brackets that secure the step corners of the bumper could become damaged after a rear impact. If a person were to use the rear bumper steps with damaged resin reinforcement brackets, part of the bumper could break off which could cause the person to fall, increasing the risk of injury. Correction: Dealers will replace the resin reinforcement brackets with steel reinforcement brackets. In addition, the rear bumper tread covers will also be replaced.
Recall number
2016-103
Recall date
2016-03-02
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2003 2004 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC241 & SRC242
Units Affected:
400,124
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Note: This recall supersedes recalls 2013113, 2014224, 2015197 and 2015269. Correction: All vehicles having not received a replacement inflator as part of the previous recall will now have a replacement inflator installed by dealers. For Matrix model vehicles, dealers may replace the front passenger airbag assembly with one equipped with a newly specified inflator.
Recall number
2016-051
Recall date
2016-02-02
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2005
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R14 / SRC R15
Units Affected:
6,962
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles, the roll rate sensors in the airbag control module may improperly calibrate if the vehicle experiences a body roll motion approximately four seconds after the ignition is turned to the ‘ON’ position. If the vehicle experiences another subsequent body roll motion, the system may erroneously detect a rollover, causing both of the side curtain airbags to deploy and the seat belt pre-tensioners to be activated. Unintended airbag and/or seat belt pre-tensioner deployment, in a non-warranted (non-impact) situation, could result in injury and increase the risk of a vehicle crash causing injury and/or property damage. Correction: Dealers will replace the airbag control module with one which has improved programming.
Recall number
2015-493
Recall date
2015-10-21
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2009 2010 2011
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SRC R10
Units Affected:
315,091
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, inconsistent application of grease during the manufacturing process could cause the driver's side power window master switch to stick or become inoperative due to electrical contact point wear. This could cause debris to accumulate between the contact points, potentially resulting in an electrical short circuit. If a short circuit occurs, the switch assembly may overheat, produce smoke, melt and/or potentially lead to a fire causing injury and/or property damage. Correction: Dealers will inspect the driver's power window master switch and apply a specialized grease that inhibits heat build-up, or replace the power window master switch circuit board, as necessary. Note: This is an expansion of recall 2012-338.
Recall number
2015-454
Recall date
2015-10-07
System affected
Label
Model year(s) affected
2014 2015
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
10,559
Notification Type:
Inconsequential
Certain vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 110 - Tire Selection and Rims. Certain compliance labels were misprinted and omitted the French translation of the word ‘RIMS’ (JANTES). As such, these labels do not meet the requirements of CMVSS 110, specifically TSD 110 S4.3.3. The numerical designation of the rim size is correctly printed and it is only the French translation of the word "RIMS" that has been omitted. Correction: A production change has been undertaken to remedy this technical non-compliance condition. No corrective recall action is required as the technical non-compliance conditions are deemed to be non-safety related.
Recall number
2015-269
Recall date
2015-06-17
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2003 2004 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SSC241 & SSC242
Units Affected:
366,860
Notification Type:
Superseded
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Note: This recall is superseded by recall 2016103. Please see recall 2016103 for more information. Click here for more information
Recall number
2015-197
Recall date
2015-05-13
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2003 2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SSC 241
Units Affected:
4,407
Notification Type:
Superseded
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Note: This recall is superseded by recall 2016103. Please see recall 2016103 for more information. Click here for more information
Recall number
2014-395
Recall date
2014-09-15
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2014
Manufacturer Recall Number:
249
Units Affected:
10,038
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the B-pillar upper trim may have been installed improperly and could interfere with the side curtain airbag in the event of a deployment. Failure of the side curtain airbag to deploy to its intended shape during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of injury to the vehicle occupants. Correction: Dealers will inspect the installation condition and will replace the trim if it is found not to be correctly installed.
Recall number
2014-224
Recall date
2014-06-12
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2003 2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SSC 241/242
Units Affected:
107,339
Notification Type:
Superseded
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Note: This recall is superseded by recall 2016103. Please see recall 2016103 for more information. Click here for more information
Recall number
2013-353
Recall date
2013-10-10
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SSC222
Units Affected:
369
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles equipped with an optional tonneau cover where the front-most panel can be opened with the vehicle ignition key, the lock cylinder could bind. If the lock cylinder were to bind in the open position, the panel may not remain closed and the tonneau cover assembly could separate from the vehicle while it is being driven. This could potentially result in property damage and pose a hazard to other road users. Correction: Dealers will affect repairs when service parts become available. In the interim, the panel release mechanism will be disabled or the tonneau cover removed, at the owner's choice.
Recall number
2013-113
Recall date
2013-04-11
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2003 2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
193-194
Units Affected:
75,000
Notification Type:
Superseded
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Note: This recall is superseded by recall 2016103. Please see recall 2016103 for more information. Click here for more information
Recall number
2012-338
Recall date
2012-10-10
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2007 2008 2009
Manufacturer Recall Number:
177
Units Affected:
239,459
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles, due to improperly applied grease, the driver's side power window master switch could stick or become inoperative. If attempts are made to lubricate the switch, the switch assembly could overheat and melt. A melting switch may produce smoke and potentially lead to a fire causing property damage and/or personal injury. Correction: Dealers will inspect the driver's power window master switch and apply a specialized grease that inhibits heat build-up, or replace the power window master switch circuit board, as necessary.
Recall number
2011-170
Recall date
2011-04-26
System affected
Powertrain
Model year(s) affected
2011
Manufacturer Recall Number:
SSC 145
Units Affected:
3,447
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the propeller shaft slip yoke may fail. This could allow the propeller shaft to separate (at the joint) and contact the road surface, which could result in a loss of vehicle control and a crash. In addition, propeller shaft separation would result in lost vehicle propulsion which, in conjunction with traffic and road conditions, and the driver's reactions, could increase the risk of a crash. Either condition could result in property damage and/or personal injury. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the propeller shaft assembly.
Recall number
2010-124
Recall date
2010-04-19
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2007 2008 2009 2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
097
Units Affected:
46,923
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, if the Toyota optional accessory "tray-type" floor mat is not secured by the retaining hooks, or if it is placed on top of an existing floor mat, the "tray-type" floor mat could move forward and interfere with the accelerator pedal. This could result in a crash causing property damage, personal injury or death. Correction: The manufacturer will notify owners to remove the "tray-type" floor mat and provide instructions on how to obtain a reimbursement.
Recall number
2010-012
Recall date
2010-01-22
System affected
Other
Model year(s) affected
2007 2008 2009 2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
010
Units Affected:
273,050
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, accelerator pedal movement may become rough, slow to return, or the pedal may stick in a depressed position. This could result in a loss of throttle control and a vehicle crash, causing property damage, personal injury or death. Correction: Dealers will install a steel reinforcement bar to the accelerator pedal assembly. With this reinforcement in place, the excess friction that can cause the pedal to stick is eliminated.
Recall number
2009-329
Recall date
2009-11-17
System affected
Structure
Model year(s) affected
2000 2001 2002 2003
Manufacturer Recall Number:
924 / 186
Units Affected:
9,722
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles operated in areas of heavy road salt usage, excessive corrosion of the rear cross member may cause separation of the spare tire stowed under the truck bed. Corrosion of the rear cross member may also affect the functionality of the rear brake line at the proportioning valve. A spare tire that separates during vehicle usage could impact nearby persons or objects resulting in personal injury and/or vehicle and property damage. Correction: Dealers will inspect the rear cross member and surrounding components and, depending on the amount of corrosion detected, either apply a corrosion-resistant compound or replace the cross member assembly.
Recall number
2009-290
Recall date
2009-10-07
System affected
Other
Model year(s) affected
2007 2008 2009 2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
011, 014, 030, 093, 083, 041, 084, 086, 081, 088
Units Affected:
437,445
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles, the accelerator pedal may become stuck in the wide open position due to an unsecured or incompatible driver's floor mat. A stuck open accelerator pedal may result in very high vehicle speeds and make it difficult to stop the vehicle, which could cause a crash, serious injury or death. Correction: Dealers will reconfigure the shape of the accelerator pedal. Certain models will also have the shape of the floor underneath the accelerator pedal modified and/or a brake override system installed.
Recall number
2007-412
Recall date
2007-12-17
System affected
Powertrain
Model year(s) affected
2007
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
2,464
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain four wheel drive vehicles, the rear driveshaft slip yoke may have received improper heat treatment during the manufacturing process. Insufficient hardness may allow the slip yoke to break, causing the propeller shaft to separate at the joint and come into contact with the road surface or the fuel tank. A fuel leak, in the presence of an ignition source, could result in a vehicle fire. Loss of the rear driveshaft would result in lost propulsion which, in conjunction with traffic and road conditions, and the driver's reactions, could increase the risk of a crash, causing personal injury or death. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if required, replace the propeller shaft.
Recall number
2007-014
Recall date
2007-01-19
System affected
Steering
Model year(s) affected
2004 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
707
Units Affected:
11,298
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles, a manufacturing issue with the front lower ball joint could result in premature wear. If the vehicle is operated for an extended period of time in this condition, the ball joint may eventually experience excessive wear and looseness, resulting in increased steering effort, reduced vehicle self-centering and noise in the front suspension. In extreme cases, when the driver continues to operate the vehicle in this condition, the lower ball joint may separate from the knuckle causing a loss of vehicle steering control. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the front lower ball joints.
Recall number
2005-151
Recall date
2005-05-18
System affected
Suspension
Model year(s) affected
2002 2003 2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
511
Units Affected:
14,341
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, a manufacturing issue with the front lower ball joint could result in premature wear. If the vehicle is operated for an extended period of time in this condition, the ball joint may eventually experience excessive wear and looseness, resulting in increased steering effort, reduced vehicle self-centering and noise in the front suspension. In extreme cases, when the driver continues to operate the vehicle in this condition, the lower ball joint may separate from the knuckle causing a loss of vehicle steering control. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the front lower ball joints.
Recall number
2001-203
Recall date
2001-07-30
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2000
Manufacturer Recall Number:
RAWP-0139
Units Affected:
900
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Equipment Description: Towing hitch kits and aftermarket trailer towing wire harness converters. Due to inadequate waterproofing performance and improper installation location of the converter, which is mounted on the exterior of the vehicle, an electrical short circuit could occur if water enters the converter housing. The short circuit can cause a failure of the converter, and if a trailer is being towed at the time, can also cause failure of the trailer lights. Correction: Dealers will replace the converter.
Recall number
2000-083
Recall date
2000-03-23
System affected
Lights And Instruments
Model year(s) affected
2000
Manufacturer Recall Number:
101
Units Affected:
530
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the plastic bulb socket in certain rear combination lamps may not have been moulded properly. This could cause a reduction bulb retention force in use and could result in the bulb falling out of the socket and an inoperative stop lamp. Correction: Dealers will replace the bulb sockets and wire harness of the rear combination lamp.
Select Another Vehicle
Search now