Nissan Sentra in Canada - Canadian Prices, Trims, Specs, Photos, Recalls | AutoTrader.ca

Nissan Sentra

Nissan Sentra

Photos

Reviews and News

View All Articles

Owner Scores

Based on 170 reviews
Comfort 8
80% Complete
Performance 8
80% Complete
Fuel Economy 8
80% Complete
Interior Design 8
80% Complete
Exterior Styling 8
80% Complete
Reliability 9
90% Complete

Owner Reviews

jeb24 good car November 24, 2017
Overall Score
We have had it for a few years and are ver satisfied. It is a comfortable car, easy to drive. Doesn't take too much gaz. We love it and would recommand it.
Comfort 8
80% Complete
Performance 8
80% Complete
Fuel Economy 8
80% Complete
Interior Design 8
80% Complete
Exterior Styling 8
80% Complete
Reliability 8
80% Complete
View all owner reviews

Recall Information

Recall number
Recall date
System affected
Model year(s) affected
Recall number
2021-382
Recall date
2021-06-18
System affected
Steering
Model year(s) affected
2020 2021
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
12,998
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue: On certain vehicles, one or both of the front tie rods may have be bent during vehicle production. This could cause the steering wheel to be off center and/or cause a vibration while driving. There is also a risk that the tie rod could break, which can cause a partial loss of steering control. Safety Risk: A loss of steering control could create the risk of a crash. Corrective Actions: Nissan will notify owners by mail and instruct you to take your car to a dealer inspect the left and right-front tie rods. If a tie rod is bent, it will be replaced.
Recall number
2020-590
Recall date
2020-12-02
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
656
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue: This recall is for certain vehicles that had an airbag inflator inspection as a part of Transport Canada Recall No. 2015-210, but the airbag inflator was not replaced. This recall will re-inspect the airbag inflator and provides a replacement of the inflator, if needed. Long-term exposure to high absolute humidity and temperature, combined with high temperature cycling, may eventually degrade the propellant contained in the passenger-front airbag. This could cause the airbag to deploy with more force than normal. If the airbag inflator ruptures, fragments could be propelled toward vehicle occupants or cause damage to the airbag assembly, preventing its proper function. Safety Risk: If the vehicle is involved in a crash requiring an airbag deployment, the airbag inflator could rupture and create a risk of injury. Corrective Actions: Owners will be notified by mail and instructed to take their vehicle to a dealer to replace the passenger-front airbag inflator. Note: The Canadian climate results in the propellant degrading slowly. This recall is being conducted as a precaution to address future risk. It is expected that all airbag inflators will be replaced before their function would be affected.
Recall number
2020-400
Recall date
2020-08-27
System affected
Lights And Instruments
Model year(s) affected
2020
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R20B4
Units Affected:
479
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
Issue: In affected lamps, the supplier did not apply the correct aiming logic when setting the headlamp aim parameters. As a result, the right-hand LED headlamp aim may be misaligned. Safety Risk: Headlamps that are not aimed properly can result in insufficient illumination of the road while driving, which may increase the risk of a crash while driving at night. Corrective Actions: Dealers will replace the right-hand LED headlamps to remedy this condition.
Recall number
2020-003
Recall date
2020-01-10
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
36,217
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue: This recall is for certain vehicles that had an airbag inflator replaced as a part of an earlier recall campaign. This recall provides a final repair. Long-term exposure to high absolute humidity and temperature, combined with high temperature cycling, may eventually degrade the propellant contained in the passenger-front airbag. This could cause the airbag to deploy with more force than normal. If the airbag inflator ruptures, fragments could be propelled toward vehicle occupants or cause damage to the airbag assembly, preventing its proper function. Safety Risk: If the vehicle is involved in a crash requiring an airbag deployment, the airbag inflator could rupture and create a risk of injury. Corrective Actions: Owners will be notified by mail and instructed to take their vehicle to a dealer to inspect the passenger-front airbag inflator. The passenger-front airbag module or inflator will be replaced as necessary. Note: The Canadian climate results in the propellant degrading slowly. This recall is being conducted as a precaution to address future risk. It is expected that all airbag inflators will be replaced before their function would be affected.
Recall number
2019-459
Recall date
2019-09-13
System affected
Visual System
Model year(s) affected
2018 2019
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R1911
Units Affected:
126,195
Notification Type:
Compliance TC
Issue: On certain vehicles, the rear view camera system does not return to the default setting when the transmission is shifted to reverse. This could cause a reduction in rear visibility if a driver had previously adjusted the camera display. Canadian regulations require that the rear view image returns to its original setting each time the camera is turned on. Safety Risk: Reduced rear visibility could increase the risk of a crash. Corrective Actions: The company will notify owners by mail and instruct them to take their vehicle to a dealer to update the software for the rear view camera.
Recall number
2018-440
Recall date
2018-08-22
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2017
Manufacturer Recall Number:
PC642 / PM828
Units Affected:
13,223
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles equipped with a mechanical key ignition system, a spring in the ignition switch could wear and break. This may allow the ignition key to inadvertently move from the ON position to the accessory (ACC) position while driving, causing the engine to shut off and the airbag system to lose power. The resulting loss of motive power, and change in steering and brake forces could increase the risk of a crash causing injury and/or damage to property. Additionally, in the event of a crash, this may also cause the airbags not to function. Correction: Dealers will inspect the lot number of the ignition switch, and replace it with a new one if it is affected. Note: Until the correction is performed, owners are advised to remove all objects from the ignition key ring, such as additional keys, key chains, etc.
Recall number
2017-385
Recall date
2017-08-04
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2014 2016 2017
Manufacturer Recall Number:
PM691
Units Affected:
768
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the passenger's frontal airbag may not deploy correctly due to an issue in manufacturing. As a result of long-term storage, there could be insufficient compression strength of the coolant within the inflator housing of the passenger's frontal airbag, which may cause the airbag to fail to deploy properly in the event of a crash (where deployment is warranted), which could increase the risk of injury to the front passenger occupant. Correction: Dealers will replace the passenger's frontal airbag inflator. Note: This is an expansion of recall 2017-215.
Recall number
2017-215
Recall date
2017-04-18
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2014 2016 2017
Manufacturer Recall Number:
PC568 / PM678
Units Affected:
1,567
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the passenger's frontal airbag may not deploy correctly due to an issue in manufacturing. As a result of long-term storage, there could be insufficient compression strength of the coolant within the inflator housing of the passenger's frontal airbag, which may cause the airbag to fail to deploy properly in the event of a crash (where deployment is warranted), which could increase the risk of injury to the front passenger occupant. Correction: Dealers will replace the passenger's frontal airbag inflator.
Recall number
2016-302
Recall date
2016-06-14
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2016
Manufacturer Recall Number:
PM655 / PC467
Units Affected:
165
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the wiring harness connector for the dual stage passenger airbag may not have been manufactured to specification, allowing the connector to become partially disconnected from the airbag. In the event of a crash, this could result in a non-deployment of the second stage of the airbag which could increase the risk of injury to the passenger. Correction: Dealers will inspect for proper connection and replace the passenger airbag module and wiring harness as necessary.
Recall number
2016-179
Recall date
2016-04-25
System affected
Seats And Restraints
Model year(s) affected
2013 2014 2015 2016
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
257,130
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, a defect in the occupant classification system could allow an adult sitting in the front passenger seat to be classified as a child or an “empty seat”. This would suppress the airbag, which could increase the risk of injury in a crash. Correction: For affected Altima, Maxima, Murano, Rogue and Sentra vehicles, dealers will reprogram the airbag control unit and the occupant classification system control unit. For affected Leaf, NV200, Pathfinder, Q50 and JX35/QX60 vehicles, dealers will replace the occupant classification system electronic control unit.
Recall number
2016-178
Recall date
2016-04-25
System affected
Seats And Restraints
Model year(s) affected
2013 2014 2015 2016
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
53,774
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, installing a child seat in the front passenger seat could deform the seat belt bracket. This could cause the occupant classification system (OCS) sensor to fail to detect the installed child seat. In the event of a crash, the airbag would not be suppressed which would increase the risk of injury. Correction: Dealers will reinforce the seatbelt bracket and update both the air bag control unit and electronic control unit.
Recall number
2015-491
Recall date
2015-10-20
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2013 2014
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
184
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Certain vehicles serviced as part of recall 2014-093 or which had the Occupant Classification System (OCS) module replaced during servicing may have been fitted with an incorrect replacement OCS module. An incorrect OCS module would impair the effectiveness of the OCS, potentially failing to properly classify an adult passenger seated in the front passenger seat. This could increase the risk of injury to the occupant in a crash. Correction: Dealers will reprogram the OCS module.
Recall number
2015-334
Recall date
2015-07-23
System affected
Structure
Model year(s) affected
2015
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
487
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
Certain vehicles fail to conform to Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 206 – Door Lock and Door Retention Components. A manufacturing error could cause the left front and/or left rear door latches to fail to fully latch and fail to meet the requirements of the standard. As a result, occupants may be at greater risk of injury in a crash, and unbelted occupants could fall from the vehicle and sustain injury. Correction: Dealers will inspect latches and replace as necessary.
Recall number
2015-210
Recall date
2015-05-15
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2004 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
62,538
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the passenger airbag inflator. Note: This is an expansion of recalls 2013117 and 2014566.
Recall number
2014-566
Recall date
2014-12-12
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
13,750
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the passenger airbag inflator. Note: This is an expansion of recalls 2013117 and 2014272. Vehicles that were repaired under the previous campaign are not affected because that remedy would have corrected the subject condition.
Recall number
2014-272
Recall date
2014-07-02
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2002 2003 2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R1302 (Nissan), R1303 (Infiniti)
Units Affected:
20,412
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the passenger airbag inflator. Note: This recall supersedes recall 2013117. Vehicles corrected as part of the previous campaign will require re-inspection and/or repair.
Recall number
2014-093
Recall date
2014-03-25
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2013 2014
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
60,022
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the front passenger seat occupant classification system software may incorrectly classify the passenger seat as empty, when it is occupied by an adult. If this occurs, the passenger airbag would be deactivated without the illumination of the airbag warning lamp. Failure of the passenger airbag to deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of injury to the seat occupant. Correction: Dealers will reprogram the occupant classification system.
Recall number
2013-117
Recall date
2013-04-11
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2002 2003
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R1302 (Nissan), R1303 (Infiniti)
Units Affected:
55,824
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the passenger (frontal) airbag inflator could produce excessive internal pressure during airbag deployment. Increased pressure may cause the inflator to rupture, which could allow fragments to be propelled toward vehicle occupants, increasing the risk of injury. This could also damage the airbag module, which could prevent proper deployment. Failure of the passenger airbag to fully deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the passenger airbag inflator.
Recall number
2013-079
Recall date
2013-03-14
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2013
Manufacturer Recall Number:
PC213 (Sentra), PC214 (Altima), PC216 (Pathfinder), PC217 (JX35)
Units Affected:
7,796
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, sensors within the Occupant Detection System (ODS) may have been manufactured incorrectly. This may cause the system to malfunction and permanently suppress the passenger airbag. Failure of the passenger frontal airbag to deploy during a crash (where deployment is warranted) could increase the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the ODS sensors.
Recall number
2013-068
Recall date
2013-02-28
System affected
Fuel Supply
Model year(s) affected
2013
Manufacturer Recall Number:
PM353
Units Affected:
90
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the fuel tank may have been manufactured incorrectly and could leak (when full). Fuel leakage, in the presence of an ignition source, could result in a fire causing property damage and/or personal injury. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the fuel tank.
Recall number
2011-421
Recall date
2011-12-15
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2010 2011
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R184 / PM180
Units Affected:
3,227
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the zinc coating applied to the positive battery terminal stud bolt (during the manufacturing process) may be thicker than desired. This could result in a voltage drop that may cause difficulty starting the engine. This can also damage the Engine Control Module (ECM), which could cause the engine to stall. Engine stalling would result in lost vehicle propulsion which, in conjunction with traffic and road conditions, and the driver’s reactions, could increase the risk of a crash causing property damage and/or personal injury. Correction: Dealers will replace the positive battery terminal.
Recall number
2010-403
Recall date
2010-11-12
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2010 2011
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R171
Units Affected:
1,873
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, a machining irregularity of bolt/washer surface on the positive battery terminal cable end may allow for a gap to occur in the contact area of the terminal. This could result in a voltage drop that may cause difficulty starting the vehicle and could result in damage to the Engine Control Module (ECM). This issue may also cause the engine to stop running while the vehicle is in motion at low speed, which could result in a crash. Correction: Dealers will replace the positive battery terminal cable end.
Recall number
2009-313
Recall date
2009-10-29
System affected
Brakes
Model year(s) affected
2009
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R135A
Units Affected:
1,282
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles, an incorrectly manufactured brake master cylinder may allow brake fluid to slowly leak into the brake booster assembly. Brake fluid leakage could ultimately result in a reduction of braking capability, which could increase the vehicle's stopping distance and cause a crash with personal injury or death. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if required, replace the brake master cylinder assembly.
Recall number
2009-125
Recall date
2009-04-27
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2007 2008 2009
Manufacturer Recall Number:
RS09-001
Units Affected:
25,517
Notification Type:
Service Campaign Mfr
On certain vehicles, one or both of the side curtain airbags may have been incorrectly positioned during vehicle assembly. If this occured, in certain types of crashes where side curtain airbag deployment is expected, a portion of the bag may be restricted from fully deploying. The side curtain airbag will still timely deploy, meet and exceed applicable safety standards. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, reposition the curtain airbag. This action is deemed a voluntary service campaign and is not being conducted under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act.
Recall number
2008-234
Recall date
2008-07-03
System affected
Brakes
Model year(s) affected
2007 2008
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
14,523
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, an incorrectly manufactured brake master cylinder may allow brake fluid to slowly leak into the brake booster assembly. Brake fluid leakage could ultimately result in a reduction of braking capability, which could increase the vehicle's stopping distance and cause a crash with personal injury or death. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if required, replace the brake master cylinder assembly.
Recall number
2007-364
Recall date
2007-11-13
System affected
Engine
Model year(s) affected
2002 2005 2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R126
Units Affected:
40,666
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles equipped with a 2.5L engine, the crank angle sensor can malfunction causing the engine to stall. Engine stalling would result in lost propulsion which, in conjunction with traffic and road conditions, and the driver's reactions, could increase the risk of a crash. Correction: Dealers will reprogram the Electronic Control Module (ECM) to prevent stalling.
Recall number
2006-161
Recall date
2006-06-30
System affected
Engine
Model year(s) affected
2003 2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R110
Units Affected:
26,234
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles equipped with a 2.5L engine, the crank angle sensor can malfunction causing the engine to stall. Engine stalling would result in lost propulsion which, in conjunction with traffic and road conditions, and the driver's reactions, could increase the risk of a crash. Correction: Dealers will reprogram the Electronic Control Module (ECM) to prevent stalling.
Recall number
2006-155
Recall date
2006-06-29
System affected
Engine
Model year(s) affected
2006
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
7,850
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Certain vehicles equipped with a four cylinder 2.5L engine may exhibit excessive oil consumption as a result of improper piston rings. If the oil level is not maintained engine damage can occur and could result in an engine fire. Correction: Dealers will reprogram the Engine Control Module (ECM) and, if required, replace the engine.
Recall number
2005-170
Recall date
2005-06-06
System affected
Fuel Supply
Model year(s) affected
2005
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R94
Units Affected:
4,988
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, a vapour hose located in the fuel tank was not formed correctly, resulting in the inner surface of the hose not being round. This could result in a gap between the hose and a connector tube. When the fuel level in the tank is full and above the joint area between the vapour hose and a connector tube, fuel may flow into the vapour hose through the gap and reach the vapour canister. If the amount of fuel flowing into the vapour canister exceeds its capacity, the excess fuel will be discharged onto the ground. A fuel leak, in the presence of an ignition source, could result in a fire. Correction: Dealers will test the vapour hose connections and, if required, replace the fuel tank.
Recall number
2003-285
Recall date
2003-11-13
System affected
Electrical
Model year(s) affected
2000 2001 2002 2003
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R87
Units Affected:
52,158
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the foam material used for the interior lining of the Engine Control Module (ECM) box out-gasses sulphur as it cures. If one of the resistors inside the ECM has a crack on the surface coating, the gas may cause corrosion of the resistor. This could cause the Malfunction Indicator Light to come on, poor drivability (idle instability, poor acceleration), or the engine to stop running without warning during vehicle operation. Correction: Dealer will remove the inside lining material from the ECM box.
Recall number
2003-267
Recall date
2003-11-05
System affected
Engine
Model year(s) affected
2000 2001 2002 2003
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R86
Units Affected:
74,143
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the circuit board for the crank position sensor may have an improper solder joint. This could cause the Service Engine Soon warning light to come on, create a no start condition, cause reduced engine power, or cause the engine to stop running without warning during vehicle operation. Correction: Dealers will replace the crankshaft position sensor and both camshaft position sensors.
Recall number
2003-060
Recall date
2003-03-10
System affected
Engine
Model year(s) affected
2002 2003 2004
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R80
Units Affected:
30,589
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles equipped with the 2.5 liter engine, the exhaust pipe hanger pin may catch debris from the road which could be ignited by contact with the main catalyst. Correction: Dealer will remove the protruding portion of the exhaust pipe hanger pin. Also, certain operating conditions may cause the pre-catalyst to overheat and damage the catalyst substrate. If substrate particles enter the combustion chamber, they may score the cylinder walls, resulting in increased oil consumption. If the engine oil level is not checked on a periodic basis, engine damage may occur which could result in fire. Correction: Dealer will reprogram the engine control unit to prevent the possibility of the pre-catalyst overheating. If the conversion efficiency of the pre-catalyst has deteriorated, then the catalyst will be replaced. The original pre-catalyst will then be inspected for evidence of damage to the catalyst substrate. If damage is present, the vehicle engine will be replaced.
Recall number
2001-291
Recall date
2001-12-11
System affected
Lights And Instruments
Model year(s) affected
2001 2002
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R67
Units Affected:
27,607
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Certain passenger vehicles fail to comply with requirements of C.M.V.S.S. no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these vehicles were missing tamperproof caps that prevent horizontal headlamp adjustment these caps are installed to prevent maladjustment of the headlamps. Correction: dealers will install a tamperproof cap over the horizontal adjustment screw for both headlamps.
Recall number
2001-277
Recall date
2001-11-19
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2000 2001
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R66
Units Affected:
12,584
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Certain passenger vehicles equipped with a 1.8-liter engine. The engine could stop running while being driven due to a defective crank position sensor. This could also result in the "service engine soon" warning light coming on or reduced engine power. If the engine stops running while driving, this could result in a crash. Correction: dealers will replace the crank position sensors.
Recall number
2001-219
Recall date
2001-08-29
System affected
Other
Model year(s) affected
2001
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R64
Units Affected:
23,136
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Certain passenger vehicles. Model year 2000-2001 Nissan Sentra vehicles manufactured from February 1, 2000, through June 26, 2001. The cooling holes in the steel road wheel may have burrs on their edge as a result of improper manufacturing. These burrs can cause stress concentration as the vehicle is being driven. Cracks can propagate these burrs between adjacent cooling holes. If enough cracks develop between the cooling holes, the wheel could fail and separate from the mounting hub without prior warning. Separation of the wheel from the vehicle while being operated could result in a vehicle crash, possibly resulting in personal injury or death. Correction: Dealers will replace all road wheels free of charge.
Recall number
2001-114
Recall date
2001-05-25
System affected
Suspension
Model year(s) affected
2001
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R-63
Units Affected:
17,659
Notification Type:
Safety TC
On certain vehicles, one or more of the three bolts used to attach each front suspension lower control arm to the body on the left and right sides may not have been properly heat treated when manufactured. The bolts could fracture, increasing the risk of a crash. Correction: Dealers will replace the lower control arm attachment bolts.
Recall number
2000-118
Recall date
2000-05-16
System affected
Lights And Instruments
Model year(s) affected
2001
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R55
Units Affected:
941
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
Certain vehicles do not comply with the requirements of CMVSS 101 - Location and Identification of Controls and Displays. Vehicles may be equipped with odometers that record in miles rather than kilometers, as required by the standard. Correction: Odometers that record in miles will be replaced with ones that record in kilometers.
Select Another Vehicle
Search now