2010 Nissan Frontier - Prices, Trims, Options, Specs, Photos, Reviews, Deals | autoTRADER.ca

2010 Nissan Frontier

Canadian MSRP
$24,098 - $41,098
Owner Score
2010 Nissan Frontier

Key Specifications for 2010 Nissan Frontier

Fuel Economy 8.7 - 14.7 City/HWY combined
Horsepower 152 - 261 hp
Drivetrain Rear-Wheel Drive, Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Gasoline
Torque 171 - 281 ft-lb
Seats 4 - 5
 

Trim Comparison

Showing of 12 trims
Standard Standard Not Available Not Available Optional Optional
 
 
 
 
Engine
Engine
 
Displacement
Displacement
 
Fuel System
Fuel System
 
Horsepower
Horsepower
 
Torque
Torque
 
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
 
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
 
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
 
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
 
Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
 
Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
 
Maximum Trailering Capacity
Maximum Trailering Capacity
 
Steering
Steering
 
Drivetrain
Drivetrain
 
Transmission
Transmission
 

Photos

autoTRADER Review

N/A

This vehicle has not yet been reviewed

Reviews and News

Owner Scores

Based on 1 reviews
Comfort 10
100% Complete
Performance 8
80% Complete
Fuel Economy 8
80% Complete
Interior Design 8
80% Complete
Exterior Styling 10
100% Complete
Reliability 10
100% Complete

Owner Reviews

TBM Too many headaches August 26, 2013 Pro 4x
Overall Score
I had a blue 2010 Nissan Frontier Pro4x. It's currently for sale on Autotrader.ca. This was a TERRIBLE vehicle. It was hard on gas, extremely unreliable, and full of odd noises. The motor is weak and dated. It was very sluggish. I bought it in 2010 and just traded it in on a new Chev truck with just around. The Nissan only had around 70 000kms on it. The rear differentials are very weak and very very expensive to replace. The whole rear end was already replaced last year and was starting to act up again. The electronic locker did not work properly. This truck was NOT worth the money I spent on it. I'm glad I don't own it anymore as it was a HUGE headache! Avoid these trucks as they don't last!!
Comfort 6
60% Complete
Performance 4
40% Complete
Fuel Economy 2
20% Complete
Interior Design 6
60% Complete
Exterior Styling 6
60% Complete
Reliability 2
20% Complete
View all owner reviews

Recall Information

Recall number
Recall date
System affected
Model year(s) affected
Recall number
2011-157
Recall date
2011-04-18
System affected
Label
Model year(s) affected
2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
2,734
Notification Type:
Inconsequential
Certain vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 110 - Tire Selection and Rims. The French-language wording displayed on the tire placard does not fully comply with the revised requirements of the Standard, which came into force on September 1, 2009. As the variation in the French text is minor, and all required safety information is displayed on the placard, no corrective recall action is required. This technical non-compliance is deemed to be non-safety related.
Recall number
2010-301
Recall date
2010-09-08
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2008 2009 2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
32
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain Garmin nüvi 750 GPS units purchased as a customer or dealer installed accessory at Nissan dealerships, the lithium-ion batteries may contain a defect that may cause them to overheat and cause a fire. Correction: Dealers will direct customers who have an affected unit to the Garmin Web site, which explains how to verify if their units are involved and includes procedures to follow for product exchange.
Recall number
2010-269
Recall date
2010-08-11
System affected
Seats And Restraints
Model year(s) affected
2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R166
Units Affected:
39
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, an improper wire insertion process during assembly resulted in an out-of-specification welding of the tether anchor wire to the seat gusset. The tether anchorage may not meet the strength requirements of the Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 210.1 - User-ready Tether Anchorages for Restraint Systems. If a child restraint is installed using the top tether anchor in the front passenger seat, the tether anchor could separate in a crash, increasing the risk of personal injury. Correction: Dealers will replace the front passenger seat tether anchor with a new one.
Recall number
2010-159
Recall date
2010-05-26
System affected
Suspension
Model year(s) affected
2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R160, R161
Units Affected:
2,759
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the lower control link assembly collars (forming the inboard attachment point to the chassis) may not have been manufactured correctly. If the collar weld fails, the cylindrical collar can open, which will allow the collar to slip over the mounting bolt and bushing. This may change the wheel camber, which could allow vehicle handling characteristics to deteriorate, possibly resulting in a crash causing property damage and/or personal injury. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the lower control link assembly.
Recall number
2010-088
Recall date
2010-03-24
System affected
Powertrain
Model year(s) affected
2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
660
Notification Type:
Service Campaign Mfr
On certain four-wheel drive vehicles, the joint portion of the front driveshaft may contain small cracks. These cracks may eventually lead to a failure, resulting in separation of the front driveshaft. If the driveshaft failed while the vehicle was moving, a loud noise would be heard. If the vehicle were in 2WD mode, the driveshaft would come to rest on the frame cross-member, and the vehicle could be operated normally. The driveshaft would not come in contact with brake, steering or fuel system components, therefore the risk of a crash is considered minimal. Correction: Dealers will inspect the vehicle and replace the front driveshaft if necessary.
Recall number
2010-086
Recall date
2010-03-23
System affected
Other
Model year(s) affected
2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
X61B
Units Affected:
111
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the fasteners securing the steering shaft positioning bracket may not have been tightened to the proper torque specification. If the fasteners are not properly tightened, they may loosen over time and the steering column may begin to rattle. If the condition is not repaired, the fasteners could come out completely. This may result in noticeable steering column movement, which may affect the ability to steer the vehicle, resulting in the possibility of a crash causing property damage, personal injury or death. Correction: Dealers will inspect the steering column and torque the fasteners to specification.
Recall number
2010-085
Recall date
2010-03-22
System affected
Airbag
Model year(s) affected
2010
Manufacturer Recall Number:
R156,
Units Affected:
111
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the fasteners securing the passenger front air bag module may not have been tightened to the proper torque specification. If the fasteners were not tightened properly, they may loosen over time and cause a rattling noise. In the event of a crash, the passenger front airbag may not deploy properly, resulting in the risk of personal injury or death. Correction: Dealers will inspect the air bag module fasteners and torque them to specification.

Similar Vehicles

Select Another Vehicle
Search now